Original Articles
 
Surgery for Sigmoid Diverticulitis. “An eighteen-year experience”
 
Kaiomarz P. Balsara1, Khojasteh Sam Dastoor2, Coomi Dubash3, Asif Gazi4
Maharra Hussain5
1Department of G.I. & Laparoscopic Surgery, Breach Candy Hospital Trust, Breach Candy, Mumbai, India. 2Bhatia Hospital, Mumbai, India. 3Breach Candy Hospital, Mumbai, India. 4Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India. 5WellCare Hospital, Dubai, UAE.


Corresponding Author
:
Dr Kaiomarz P. Balsara 
Email: kaiozyb@gmail.com


Abstract

Background and Aims: Sigmoid diverticulosis is a disease of the elderly. Diverticulitis occurs in 25% of these patients, of which 5% will need intervention. Due to associated co-morbidities, surgery carries considerable morbidity. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of patients undergoing surgery for diverticulitis in the immediate post-operative period and 6 months after surgery.      
Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients operated upon for sigmoid diverticulitis from January 1998 to December 2016. All relevant data was tabulated. Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months after their last intervention.
Results: Ninety-six patients with sigmoid diverticulitis were operated.  The median age was 66 years and 50 were females. Twenty-five patients had uncomplicated disease, 71 had complicated disease. Emergency surgery was performed in 17 patients. Sixteen patients with complicated abscesses treatment was attempted by CT or laparoscopic guided drainage. Elective surgery was done in 78 patients, of which 21 had laparoscopic resections. Six patients died after surgery, nine required re-interventions. Eighty-four patients reported a satisfactory outcome while 5 had recurrent pain, 4 troublesome hernias and 3 had severe constipation.
Conclusion: Surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis carries significant morbidity requiring re-surgery and often prolonged hospital stay. In patients with complicated abscesses, we resort to CT or laparoscopic drainage and later an elective one stage resection. Since 2014 we have attempted laparoscopic resections whenever possible to reduce morbidity. 
A satisfactory outcome was reported by 88% of patients.

48uep6bbphidcol2|ID
48uep6bbphidvals|2953
48uep6bbph|2000F98CTab_Articles|Fulltext
Introduction

Sigmoid diverticulosis and its complications account for a major bulk of work in colorectal units in developed countries1. In India diverticulosis is relatively uncommon, though with increasing life span and change in life style, there seems to be a rising trend indetection of the disease.Between 10 to 25% of patients will develop a complication and around 5% of these will need an intervention2. Since the last decade there has been a move towards a more conservative approach in treating diverticulitis especially if uncomplicated. In complicated disease surgery is usually indicated. There is a paucity of publications on surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis in the Indian literature3-5. In this retrospective study of prospectively collected data we outline our results of surgery for diverticulitis.  This is the largest reported number of cases of sigmoid diverticulitis from India spanning a period of 18 years.

Methods

From January 1998 to December 2016, all patients with sigmoid diverticulitis who were operated upon, were prospectively entered into a database. An informed consent of patients was taken regarding data collection. The hospital ethics committee permission was taken accordingly. Patient demographics, radiological and endoscopic investigations, operations performed and complications were recorded in detail. Patients were admitted in an emergency or an elective setting. Emergencies comprised of patients with generalised peritonitis, large bowel obstruction or those with localised disease with abscess formation. The elective admissions were those with fistulae and recurrent bouts of uncomplicated diverticulitis. (Table 1)



Patients in the emergency setting were given intravenous fluids (IV), broad spectrum antibiotics with anaerobic coverage and ionotropic support if required. After a baseline sonography, most patients had a CT scan. A plain CT scan was done for those with peritonitis. In the group with obstruction, IV contrast with rectal contrast was used and those with abscesses a full CT scan with oral, IV and rectal contrast was used. 
Patients with fistulae and recurrent diverticulitis also had a full CT scan. The disease was graded as per the Modified Hinchey classification (Table 1). In the elective setting a complete colonoscopy was attempted to rule out an associated malignancy of the colon.
Patients with generalised peritonitis and intestinal obstruction underwent a Hartmann’s resection or a resection and anastomosis with a diverting stoma.
Those with large, (> 4 centimetres ) or distant abscesses (Hinchey type IIb) had an attempt at CT or laparoscopic guided drainage of the abscess. When this was not possible, a laparotomy with a Hartmann’s or a resection anastomosis and a diverting stoma was done.
Patients with fistulae and recurrent diverticulitis were always operated upon in the elective setting when the disease was quiescent. A one stage resection was attempted in all patients and a diverting ostomy was only added when patients had multiple co-morbidities. Since 2014 we have used a laparoscopic resection whenever possible in the elective setting. 
Post-operative complications were classified as per the Clavien-Dindo (CD) Classification (Table 2).



Reversal of a Hartmann’s procedure and closure of the stoma was done 3 months after the initial operation.All patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months after their last intervention. This was done by clinical evaluation by the 1st author.

Results

Ninety-six patients were operated upon during this study period. (Figure 1) The age range was from 36 to 97 years (mean 66) and there were 50 female patients.



Thirty-three patients were admitted in an emergency. Fifteen with generalised peritonitis (14 Hinchey type III, one patient Hinchey type IV). Two patients had intestinal obstruction and 16 had large or complicated abscesses.Sixty-three patients were admitted for elective sigmoid resection. 
In the emergency setting, 15 patients with peritonitis had a laparotomy. Thirteen underwent Hartmann’s resection and 2 a resection anastomosis with ileostomy.
Sixteen patients had complicated abscesses (Hinchey type 2B). These were perforations with abscesses which were larger than 4 cms or in the pelvis.Six could be drained by CT guided pigtail catheters and subsequently went on to have elective resections, 3 open and 3 laparoscopic. Two patients had laparoscopic drainage of abscesses, one of whom had to be converted to a Hartmann procedure 20 days later due to continued sepsis. The other patient settled and refused elective surgery. In the remaining 8 patients the abscesses could not be accessed for drainage. All had open surgery, 3 Hartmann’s resections and 5 resection and anastomosis with a diverting stoma.
Two patientswith strictures presented with obstruction and marked dilatation of the proximal colon. Both underwent a Hartmann’s procedure. 
Sixty-three patients were admitted for elective resections. Twenty-five had acute diverticulitis, (Hinchey type I and IIA) and had suffered 1 to 4 attacks requiring prior admission to hospital and treatment with antibiotics.Thirty-six patients presented with fistulae, 32 colo-vesical and 4 colo-vaginal. Two had strictures with recurrent pain, severe enough, to warrant elective surgery.
Colonoscopy was attempted before all elective resections, however only 36 could have complete colonoscopies. Two patients had associated colon cancers, 1 with a stricture and the other with a colo-vesical fistula.
Thirty patients with fistula underwent a one stage resection, 7 laparoscopic and 23 open surgery. Six had resection anastomosis with ileostomy. All patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis had one stage resections (16 open, 9 laparoscopic). Two patients with strictures had elective one stage laparoscopic resections.
Six patients died within 30 days of surgery (Clavien Dindo V) (6). Three had generalised peritonitis and sepsis, 3 with colovesical fistula died of myocardial infarctions.  The hospital stayranged from 4 to 115 days (mean 12.4). Nine patients had complications requiring interventions (Table 2). Fifteen had wound infection and 14 had incisional hernia (10 main wound, 4 from stoma sites).
Twenty-one patients had further surgery to restore continuity of the alimentary tract which comprised of 7 ileostomy closures and 14 Hartmann reversals. The time of closure ranged from 3 to 18 months. 
At 6 months follow up 12 patients complained of an unsatisfactory outcome. Five had recurrent left sided pain but no obvious cause was found. Three patients had increasing constipation and dependency on laxatives. A further 4 patients had developed large incisional hernia which affected their daily routine. 

Discussion

Sigmoid diverticulosis, a predominantly western disease is showing an increasing trend in India.7-9 Data from publications from India suggest an increase from 3 to 9% in incidence. Hence surgeons and physicians in India need to be aware of the disease, its complications and manage patients with the best available evidence. Diverticulitis develops in  10 to 25% of patients and of these 5% percent will need anintervention2. Being a disease of the elderly, these patients are often frail and have co-morbid conditions which increases the morbidity. Hinchey classified diverticulitis into 4 grades. This has been modified with the advent of CT scan and is the most common grading system used. Uncomplicated diverticulitis is disease restricted to the colon or pericolic region. Complicated disease comprises of distant or complex abscesses, fistulae, stricture and perforations.
Barium enema to evaluate diverticulitis has largely been replaced by a CT scan. A CT scan helps in grading the disease and can alsoassist for catheter drainage of an abscess10. Abdominal sonography is a good initial study but has several limitations, especially if there is an ileus11. We used a CT scan in 91/96 cases. We believe a colonoscopy is always indicated in the elective setting to rule out an associated malignancy2. This can be difficult in a thickened distorted sigmoid colon, even with a paediatric scope. In our series it was possible in 36 of 65 patients.
Over the last decade our treatment plan for diverticulitis has changed from an aggressive surgical approach to a more conservative one. Patients with uncomplicated disease were initially offered surgery after 1 or 2 two attacks. However recent evidence suggests that in these patients surgery need not be offered, irrespective of the number of attacks12. Exceptions to this are those who are immuno-compromised and should be operated upon after a single episode of diverticulitis13,14. We now offer patients with uncomplicated disease surgery only after a third attack, or those who have recurrent pain without evidence of an abscess, an entity labelled as smouldering diverticulitis.15
Patients who have had a complicated attack of diverticulitis have high recurrence rates. Resection of the sigmoid is advised after an initial attack.Those with large or distant abscess, should have an attempt at drainage by a CT guided pig tail catheter ora laparoscopic assisted method. This is an emerging concept and avoids resection with adiverting stoma. A one stage resection can be planned once the disease settles. We had 16 patients with complicated abscesses. In 6 a CT guided drainage was done and in 2 a laparoscopic drainage.  These patients went onto to have elective resections. In the other patients, drainage was not possible and they had surgery.
Fistulae were found in a third of our patients. There were 32 colo-vesicaland 4 colo-vaginal fistulas. Colo-vesical fistulae were more common in males. Recurrent urinary tract infection was the main symptom and pneumaturia was an alarm sign that made patients seek an opinion. All 4 women with colo-vaginal fistulas had hysterectomies done. The uterus acts as aprotective buffer between the sigmoid and vagina. Surgery for these patients in our series was always elective and a one stage resection was possible in 30/36 patients. A stricture is an uncommon reason to operate  and those who need surgery often do so in an emergency situation with a staged procedure16.  We had 4 patients with strictures, 2 presented with acute obstruction and 2 with chronic recurrent pain and obstructive symptoms. 
Laparoscopy has revolutionised surgery for diverticulitis and there is good evidence to support this17,18. In our own series of 21 resections results have been extremely gratifying with a mean stay of 5 days.The only complication was one incisional hernia froma specimen extraction wound.
Recently, laparoscopy has been used for lavage and drainage in Hinchey type III disease as an interim procedure, followed by a one stage resection.  After a seminal publication19 and then some controversial reports, this method has gained acceptance in Scandinavian counties20. We have no experience yet with laparoscopy for Hinchey type III disease.
A Hartmann’s resection was our procedure of choice in the emergency setting and a majority could be reversed14,18. However, literature suggests that only 40% of patients get a reversal, since this is a major operation and many elderly patients do not become fit to undergo surgery. Because the quality of life is adversely affected for those with a colostomy21, there is an increasing trend to perform a resection anastomosis  with a temporary stoma.  Evidence suggests that patients who present with peritonitis and are hemodynamically stable22,23 can safely undergo a resection anastomosis with a diverting ostomy. Our experience also supports this and we have done 7 primary resections with a stoma in 25 emergency operations.
Complications and mortality after surgery for diverticulitis have been well documented24. We had 9 serious complications (CD grade III), 15 wound infections (CD grade I) and incisional hernia in 14 (CD d) (Table 2). Hernias occur from the main wound and from stomasites are often large and difficult to treat. Most occurred within the first 6 months of surgery. Six months after surgery 84 patients could lead a normal life. Twelve were dissatisfied with recurrent pain, constipation and troublesome hernia. A more prudent case selection in uncomplicated disease could have avoided this. 

Conclusion

In this case series spanning almost 2 decades our treatment for diverticulitis has changed. For uncomplicated disease we use a conservative approach and will offer surgery only after a third attack. For complicated abscesses a CT or laparoscopic guided drainage is attempted followed by elective one stage resection. In the emergency setting a resection anastomosis with a temporary stoma is done if the patient is haemodynamically stable.  Since 2014 we have used laparoscopic resections with good results and this has reduced the morbidity of surgery and has allowed enhanced recovery.

References
  1. Etzioni DA, Mack TM, Beart Jr RW, Kaiser AM. Diverticulitis in the United States: 1998–2005: changing patterns of disease and treatment. Annals of surgery. 2009;249(2):210-7.
  2. Feingold D, Steele SR, Lee S, Kaiser A, Boushey R, Buie WD, et al. Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2014;57(3):284-94.
  3. Kurumboor P, Kamalesh N, Pramil K, George D, Shetty R, Ponnambathayil S, et al. Laparoscopic Management of Colonic Diverticular Disease and its Complications: an Analysis. Indian Journal of Surgery. 2017;79(5):380-3.
  4. Kakodkar R, Gupta S, Nundy S. Complicated colonic diverticulosis: surgical perspective from an Indian Centre. Tropical gastroenterology: official journal of the Digestive Diseases Foundation. 2005;26(3):152-5.
  5. Balsara K, Dubash C. Complicated sigmoid diverticulosis. Indian journal of gastroenterology: official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology. 1998;17(2):46-7.
  6. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of surgery. 2004;240(2):205.
  7. Umman P, Varkey R, Johnson D, Gopal G, John A. Diverticular disease of colon: Changing trends. International Journal of Case Reports and Images (IJCRI). 2016;7(12):781-6.
  8. Kamalesh NP, Prakash K, Pramil K, Zacharias P, Ramesh GN, Philip M. Prevalence and patterns of diverticulosis in patients undergoing colonoscopy in a southern Indian hospital. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2012;31(6):337-9.
  9. Goenka M, Nagi B, Kochhar R, Bhasin D, Singh A, Mehta S. Colonic diverticulosis in India: the changing scene. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology. 1994;13:86-.
  10. Siewert B, Tye G, Kruskal J, Sosna J, Opelka F. Impact of CT-guided drainage in the treatment of diverticular abscesses: size matters. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2006;186(3):680-6.
  11. Rafferty J, Shellito P, Hyman NH, Buie WD. Practice parameters for sigmoid diverticulitis. Diseases of the colon & rectum. 2006;49(7):939-44.
  12. Regenbogen SE, Hardiman KM, Hendren S, Morris AM. Surgery for diverticulitis in the 21st century: a systematic review. JAMA surgery. 2014;149(3):292-303.
  13. Morris AM, Regenbogen SE, Hardiman KM, Hendren S. Sigmoid diverticulitis: a systematic review. Jama. 2014;311(3):287-97.
  14. Biondo S, Trenti L, Elvira J, Golda T, Kreisler E. Outcomes of colonic diverticulitis according to the reason of immunosuppression. The American Journal of Surgery. 2016;212(3):384-90.
  15. Horgan A, McConnell E, Wolff B, Paterson C. Atypical diverticular disease. Diseases of the colon & rectum. 2001;44(9):1315-8.
  16. Stocchi L. Current indications and role of surgery in the management of sigmoid diverticulitis. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG. 2010;16(7):804.
  17. Masoomi H, Buchberg B, Nguyen B, Tung V, Stamos MJ, Mills S. Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open colectomy in elective surgery for diverticulitis. World journal of surgery. 2011;35(9):2143-8.
  18. Bouillot J, Berthou J, Champault G, Meyer C, Arnaud J, Samama G, et al. Elective laparoscopic colonic resection for diverticular disease. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques. 2002;16(9):1320-3.
  19. Myers E, Hurley M, O’sullivan G, Kavanagh D, Wilson I, Winter D. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis. British Journal of Surgery. 2008;95(1):97-101.
  20. Schultz J, Wallon C, Blecic L, Forsmo H, Folkesson J, Buchwald P, et al. One-year results of the SCANDIV randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic lavage versus primary resection for acute perforated diverticulitis. British Journal of Surgery. 2017;104(10):1382-92.
  21. Vermeulen J, Gosselink MP, Busschbach JJ, Lange JF. Avoiding or reversing Hartmann’s procedure provides improved quality of life after perforated diverticulitis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2010;14(4):651-7.
  22. Salem L, Flum DR. Primary anastomosis or Hartmann’s procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review. Diseases of the colon & rectum. 2004;47(11):1953-64.
  23. Oberkofler CE, Rickenbacher A, Raptis DA, Lehmann K, Villiger P, Buchli C, et al. A multicenter randomized clinical trial of primary anastomosis or Hartmann’s procedure for perforated left colonic diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis. Annals of surgery. 2012;256(5):819-27.
  24. Haas JM, Singh M, Vakil N. Mortality and complications following surgery for diverticulitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. United European gastroenterology journal. 2016;4(5):706-13.