Sitemap | Policies | Feedback    
 About the Journal
Editorial Board
Journal Subscription
Instructions for Authors
E-mail Alerts
Forthcoming Events
Advertise with Us
Contact Us
 
Article Options
FULL TEXT
ABSTRACT
PDF
Printer Friendly Version
Search Pubmed for
Search Google Scholar for
Article Statistics
Bookmark and Share
 
Serological assessment of gastric intestinal metaplasia and atrophy using pepsinogen-I, pepsinogen-II and gastrin-17 levels in a low incidence area of gastric cancer endemic for H. pylori infection
 
Uday C Ghoshal,1Sushil Kumar,1Narendra Krishnani,2Niraj Kumari,2 Dipti Chourasia,1ShwetaTripathi1
Departments of Gastroenterology1
and Pathology,2
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate
Institute of Medical Sciences,
Lucknow-226014, India


Corresponding Author
: Dr. Uday C. Ghoshal
Email: udayghoshal@gmail.com


Abstract

Background: Intestinal metaplasia (IM), a precursor of gastric cancer (GC), may be amenable to non-invasive assessment.

Aims:We evaluated the diagnostic utility of serum PG-I, PG-II, PG-I/PG-II ratio and gastrin-17 (G-17) to detect IM and atrophy.

Methods: The study was conducted at a tertiary care center located in a low-incidence area of GC, endemic for H. pylori infection. Patients with GC and dyspepsia were evaluated by endoscopy, histology for IM (H&E, PAS and Alcian blue stains), gastritis and H. pylori (H&E and Giemsa stains) infection, which was considered to be present if two of three tests (rapid urease test, IgG antibody and histology) were positive. Serum levels of PG-I, PG-II and G-17 were estimated using ELISA.

Results: Of 98 patients with GC and 62 with dyspepsia, 35 (36%) and 9 (14%) had IM, respectively (p=0.004). Patients with IM (n=44) had lower PG-I/PG-II ratio than those without IM (n=116; median 4.4, 0.37-23.6 vs. 6.3, 0.19-38.6, respectively; p=0.005). A cut-off value of PG-I/PG-II ratio of 6.0 had 64% sensitivity and 52% specificity for detecting IM (area under ROC curve 0.64). 26/44 (60%) patients with IM and 52/98 (53%) with GC had PG-I/PG-II ratio <6. Serum G-17 was comparable among patients with and without IM.

Conclusions: Though PG-I/PG-II ratio was lower in patients with IM, only 60% had a lower ratio suggesting that this test and G-17 may not be useful to detect IM in a low-incidence area of GC, endemic for H. pylori infection.