Sitemap | Policies | Feedback    
 About the Journal
Editorial Board
Journal Subscription
Instructions for Authors
E-mail Alerts
Forthcoming Events
Advertise with Us
Contact Us
 
Article Options
FULL TEXT
PDF
Printer Friendly Version
Search Pubmed for
Search Google Scholar for
Article Statistics
Bookmark and Share
Editorial
 
Percutaneous drainage of liver hydatid cysts: Is evidence enough to accept it as first modality of choice?
Keywords :
Showkat Ali Zargar
Department of Gastroenterology,
Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS),
Srinagar, Kashmir, India


Corresponding Author
: Dr. Showkat Ali Zargar
Email:
showkatzargar6@gmail.com


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/

Human hydatid disease or cystic echinococcosis, caused by the larval form of cestode Echinococcus granulosus, still continues to be a common health problem in most sheep rearing regions of the Asia, Europe, the Mediterranean, South America, Australia and New Zealand. The liver is the most frequently parasitized organ in humans with about 60% infestation rate and with 75% of cysts being located in the right lobe.[1,2]

Until three decades ago, surgery was the only treatment option available for liver hydatid cysts (LHCs). However, surgery is not possible if the cyst is located centrally in the liver or in contiguity with vascular structures. Surgery, the oldest and still most common treatment employed for LHCs carries a definite risk of morbidity and mortality. Also, the recurrence of more than 10% is a bigger concern associated with surgery. The figures of morbidity, mortality and recurrence further increase in patients with multiple cysts, disseminated disease or recurrent disease. Also, patients with cardiac, respiratory, renal or neurologic co-morbidities who carry high risk for general anesthesia are not good candidates for surgery.[3,4,5] Therefore, an effective and safe alternative treatment modality will be highly desirable.

During the last three decades, two alternative forms of therapy for LHCs have evolved; systemic chemotherapy and percutaneous drainage (PD). Mebendazole was the initial chemotherapeutic agent but has limited use due to its poor efficacy. Mebendazole has been largely replaced with albendazole which is well absorbed unlike the former compound. Although the success rate of the systemic chemotherapy varies with the type of cyst, clinical experience indicates that about one-third of the patients are cured with such treatment. Chemotherapy achieves a cyst disappearance rate of 30%, partial response in another 30% and no response in 40%. It is effective in small cysts (<4 cm diameter), cysts with thin walls and in younger patients. It is indicated in patients who are high risks for surgery, in patients with multiple peritoneal cysts, disseminated systemic disease, to prevent secondary echinococcosis after spillage during surgery, and in combination with PD. Imidazoles cause hepatic and hematologic toxicities and are potentially embryotoxic and teratogenic.[6,7,8,9]

The third option for treatment of hydatid cysts in the liver and some other locations is the PAIR procedure wherein “P” stands for percutaneous puncture of the cyst under sonographic guidance; “A” stands for aspiration of substantial amount of the cyst contents; “I” stands for injection of proctoscolicidal agent (e.g. hypertonic saline, 95% ethanol, albendazole or betadine), and “R” for reaspiration. Recent experiences on PAIRs in thousands of patients from different parts of the world have documented excellent results in terms of efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness.10,11,12The long-term results are equally satisfactory.[13,14,15,16,17,18]Other advantages include requirement for minimal infrastructure and can be performed in remote resource poor regions where echinococcosis is endemic.

PD of LHCs has been contraindicated for risk of anaphylactic shock and spillage and seeding of scolices resulting in peritoneal implantation and dissemination. These long-held concerns have been challenged by many studies with PAIR. Anaphylaxis is a very rare complication of PAIR procedure. Likewise, rupture and spillage during PAIR procedure is rare because of use of improved imaging, fine needles and catheters and the right intercostal transhepatic route for puncture.[10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]

Randomized controlled[19]as well as uncontrolled studies have shown superiority of PAIR over surgery in terms of shorter hospital stay, complications and cost-effectiveness.[20,21,22]On the basis of positive short-term and long-term results World Health Organization (WHO) recommended PAIR approach for management of uncomplicated LHCs in selected cases.[23]Although, in most reported studies PAIR technique was highly efficient and safe for uncomplicated unilocular cyst (Gharbi type 1 or WHO CE1) and unilocular cyst with ruptured laminated membranes (Gharbi type 2 or WHO CE3a), but many authors experienced problems regarding efficacy and safety with PAIR in patients with multivesicular cysts with minimal (Gharbi type 3 or WHO type CE2) or predominant non-drainable contents (Gharbi type 3 or WHO type CE3b). Some authors reported high failure rate of upto 30% in PAIR of multivesicular cysts.[20,24]For effective treatment of such LHCs each daughter cyst has to be punctured separately which is laborious and inconvenient for the patient. The aim in surgical treatment is to inactivate the parasite, evacuate the cyst cavity, remove the germinal membrane and obliterate the residual cyst cavity. The aim of percutaneous treatment is the same except for removal of the germinal layer. A number of modified percutaneous techniques have been developed to address some of the shortcomings of PAIR to effectively and safely treat multivesicular cysts. Saremi et al[25]described a percutaneous approach in which a special cutting instrument is used to fragment and evacuate daughter cysts and laminated membrane while the cavity is continuously irrigated with scolicidals. Their described technique is similar to surgery. Aspiration of both fluid and solid contents including the membranes facilitates the anti-parasitic effect of scolicidals more effectively. The wide bore of the instrument permits effective percutaneous removal of all hydatid contents. Schipper et al[26]described a percutaneous evacuation of cyst contents (PEVAC) using a large bore catheter after dilatation of the tract over two sessions. The article in this issue of the journal[27] describes a technique almost similar to those described by Schipper et al and Haddad et al.[26,28] These modified PAIR procedures are interesting and encouraging for the treatment of types CE2 and CE3b LHCs (type 3 Gharbi cysts) but suffer from flaws of including small number of patients and short follow-up.

In presence of availability of three treatment options, it remains an open question as to whether PAIR can be used as the first line of therapy for LHCs. A non-operative therapy always carries potential economic and societal advantages. Smego et al[21]conducted a meta-analysis across 21studies comprising of 769 patients with 1,072 hepatic cysts undergoing PAIR plus albendazole therapy and compared the findings with 952 era-matched controls treated with surgery. They found that PAIR plus chemotherapy is associated with significantly greater clinical and parasitological efficacy; lower rates of morbidity, mortality and disease recurrence; and shorter hospital stay (2.4 days vs. 15 days).[21]Such results are interesting but suffer from the same flaws (small series, retrospective, short follow-up, etc). Dziri et al[29] attempted to address the role of chemotherapy, surgery and/or PAIR for LHCs and concluded that PD plus albendazole resulted in safe and efficient treatment for selected patients. A Cochrane data systemic review in 2006 assessed the benefits and harms of PAIR with or without benzimidazole coverage for patients with uncomplicated hepatic hydatid cyst in comparison with sham/no intervention, surgery or medical treatment.[23] The authors identified only two randomised clinical trials, one comparing PAIR versus surgical treatment[19] and the other comparing PAIR (with or without albendazole) versus albendazole alone.[8] They concluded that PAIR seems promising, but there is insufficient evidence to support or refute PAIR with or without benzimidazole coverage for treating patients with uncomplicated hepatic hydatid cyst and suggested need to undertake well-designed randomised clinical trials to address this issue. Kabaalioglu et al[20] in 2006 concluded that PAIR is safe and effective for LHCs of types I and II and surgery should be reserved for type III and certain active type IV cysts. A recent paper from Turkey reported a single-center experience comparing surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and percutaneous treatments in 355 patients over a period of 10 years and concluded that PAIR is an effective and safe option.[22] On the basis of current evidence PAIR procedure is a safe and efficient option for uncomplicated LHCs of types I and II by Gharbi classification or CE1 and CE3a (WHO-IWGE classification) but the evidence for type III (Gharbi) or CE2 and CE3b (WHO classification) multivesicular cysts with slight or significant non-drainable contents in favour of modified techniques of PAIR is encouraging but not well-established. Since the time of appearance of recurrence is quite variable, it has been suggested to continue monitoring for extended period of 5 years or more before it can be said that patient has no recurrence. Finally, the choice between modified PAIR and surgery will be dictated by local expertise.

References

  1. Chin J. Echinococcosis. In: Control of communicable diseases manual. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2000.p.176–9.
  2. Ammann RW, Eckert J. Cestodes. Echinococcus. Gastroenterol Clin North Am.1996;25:655–89.
  3. Mottaghian H, Saidi F. Postoperative recurrence of hydatid disease. Br J Surg. 1978;65:237–42.
  4. Cangiotti L, Giulini SM, Muiesan P, Nodari F, Begni A, Tiberio G. Hydatid disease of the liver: long-term results of surgical treatment. G Chir. 1991;12:501–4.
  5. Atalay F, Kirimlioglu V, Gundogdu H, Akincioglu T, Gencer A. Surgery for hydatid cysts of the liver. Hiroshima J Med Sci. 1995;44:89–92.
  6. Mohamed AE, Yasawy MI, Al Karawi MA. Combined albendazole and praziquantel versus albendazole alone in the treatment of hydatid disease. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45:1690–4.
  7. Franchi C, Di Vico B, Teggi A. Long-term evaluation of patients with hydatidosis treated with benzimidazole carbamates. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29:304–9.
  8. Khuroo MS, Dar MY, Yattoo GN, Zargar SA, Javaid G, Khan BA, et al. Percutaneous drainage versus albendazole therapy in hepatic hydatidosis: a prospective, randomized study. Gastroenterology. 1993;104:1452–9.
  9. Arif SH, Shams-Ul-Bari, Wani NA, Zargar SA, Wani MA, Tabassum R, et al. Albendazole as an adjuvant to the standard surgical management of hydatid cyst liver. Int J Surg. 2008;6:448–51.
  10. Bret PM, Fond A, Bretagnolle M, Valette PJ, Thiesse P, Lambert R,.et al. Percutaneous aspiration and drainage of hydatid cysts in the liver. Radiology.1988:168:617–20.
  11. Khuroo MS, Zargar SA, Mahajan R.Echinococcus granulosus cysts in the liver. management with percutaneous drainage. Radiology.1991;180:141–5.
  12. Acunas B, Rozanes I, Celik L, Minareci O, Acunas G, Alper A,et al. Purely cystic hydatic disease of the liver: treatment with percutaneous aspiration and injection of hypertonic saline. Radiology.1992:182:541–3.
  13. Akhan 0, Ozmen MN, Dincer A, Sayek I, Gocmen A. Liver hydatid disease: long-term results of percutaneous treatment. Radiology.1996:198:259–64.
  14. Ustunsoz B, Akhan O, Kamiloglu MA,Somuncu I, Uðurel MS, Cetiner S. Percutaneous treatment of hydatid cysts of the liver: long-term results. AMJ Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:91–6.
  15. Odev K, Paksoy Y, Arslan A,Aygün E, Sahin M, Karaköse S,et al. Sonographically guided percutaneous treatment of hepatic hydatid cysts: long-term results. J Clin Ultrasound. 2000;28:469–78.
  16. Bosanac ZB, Lisanin L. Percutaneous drainage of hydatid cyst in the liver as a primary treatment: review of 52 consecutive cases with long-term follow-up. Clin Radiol. 2000;55:839–48.
  17. Etlik O, Arslan H, Bay A, Sakarya ME, Harman M, Temizoz O,et al. Abdominal hydatid disease: long-term results of percutaneous treatment. Acta Radiol. 2004;45:383–9.
  18. Goktay AY, Secil M, Gulcu A,Hosgor M, Karaca I, Olguner M,et al. Percutaneous treatment of hydatid liver cysts in children as a primary treatment: long-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16:831–9.
  19. Khuroo MS, Wani NA, Javid G,Khan BA, Yattoo GN, Shah AH,et al. Percutaneous drainage compared with surgery for hepatic hydatid cysts. N Engl J Med.1997;337:881–7.
  20. Kabaalioglu A, Ceken K, Alimoglu E, Apaydin A. Percutaneous imaging-guided treatment of hydatid liver cysts: do long-term results make it a first choice? Eur J Radiol. 2006;59:65–73.
  21. Smego RA Jr, Bhatti S, Khaliq AA, Beg MA. Percutaneous aspiration-injection-reaspiration drainage plus albendazole or mebendazole for hepatic cystic echinococcosis: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis.2003;37:1073–83.
  22. Yagci G, Ustunsoz B, Kaymakcioglu N, Bozlar U, Gorgulu S, Simsek A, et al. Results of surgical, laparoscopic, and percutaneous treatment for hydatid disease of the liver: 10 years experience with 355 patients. World J Surg. 2005;29:1670–9.
  23. Nasseri MS, Abrishami A, Malekzadeh R. Percutaneous needle aspiration, injection, and reaspiration with or without benzimidazole coverage for uncomplicated hepatic hydatid cysts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;19:CD003623.
  24. Giorgio A, Tarantino L, de Stefano G, Francica G, Mariniello N, Farella N, et al. Hydatid liver cyst: an 11-year experience of treatment with percutaneous aspiration and ethanol injection. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20:729–38.
  25. Saremi F. Percutaneous drainage of hydatid cysts: use of a new cutting device to avoid leakage. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158:83–5.
  26. Schipper HG, Lameris JS, van Delden OM, Rauws EA, Kager PA. Percutaneous evacuation (PEVAC) of multivesicular echinococcal cysts with or without cystobiliary fistulas which contain non-drainable material: first results of a modified PAIR method. Gut. 2002;50:718–23.
  27. Mohan S, Garg, SK, Kathuria M, Baijal SS. Mechanical suction through wide bore catheters for nonsurgical management of Gharbi type III hepatic hydatid cysts. Trop Gastroenterol. 2011;32:189–95.
  28. Haddad MC, Sammak BM, Al-Karawi M. Percutaneous treatment of heterogenous predominantly solid echopattern echinococcal cysts of the liver. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000;23:121–5.
  29. Dziri C, Haouet K, Fingerhut A. Treatment of hydatid cyst of the liver:where is the evidence? World J Surg. 2004;28:731–6.