Sitemap | Policies | Feedback    
 About the Journal
Editorial Board
Journal Subscription
Instructions for Authors
E-mail Alerts
Forthcoming Events
Advertise with Us
Contact Us
 
Article Options
FULL TEXT
ABSTRACT
PDF
Printer Friendly Version
Search Pubmed for
Search Google Scholar for
Article Statistics
Bookmark and Share
 
Comparison of 7 staging systems in north Indian cohort of hepatocellular carcinoma
 
*Sanjay Sarma1, *Balkrishan Sharma1, Yogesh Kumar Chawla1, Shweta Kapil1, Bhupesh Singla1, Naveen Kalra2, Arunashu Behera3, Ajay Duseja1, Radha Krishan Dhiman1
Departments of Hepatology1,
Radiology2 and General Surgery3
Post Graduate Institute of Medical education & Research
Chandigarh, India


Corresponding Author
: Dr. YK Chawla
Email : ykchawla@gmail.com


Abstract

Background & Aim: Many liver staging systems have been proposed for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however it is still controversial which staging system is best. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of 7 different staging systems in predicting survival in an Indian cohort of patients with HCC.

 

Methods: In this prospective study, 101 HCC patients were diagnosed and stratified according to 7 different staging systems; along with analysis of independent predictors of survival and their correlation with it (Kaplan-Meier analysis).

 

Results: CLIP, Tokyo score and BCLC staging system showed a significant difference in the probability of survival. All other staging systems failed to show a significant difference in survival. Age, portal vein thrombosis, serum bilirubin, MELD score showed a significant difference with survival in univariate analysis. However, serum bilirubin was the independent predictor of survival with a hazard ratio of 1.609 (95% CI 1.015-2.553, p= 0.043).

 

Conclusion: The CLIP, Tokyo score and BCLC are the most useful staging systems in an Indian cohort.